In re Allen

361 S.E.2d 122, 293 S.C. 411, 1987 S.C. LEXIS 326
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedSeptember 22, 1987
StatusPublished

This text of 361 S.E.2d 122 (In re Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Allen, 361 S.E.2d 122, 293 S.C. 411, 1987 S.C. LEXIS 326 (S.C. 1987).

Opinions

ORDER

The above named filed a petition on June 9,1986, seeking reinstatement to the practice of law in the State of South Carolina with no limitations. Pursuant to the Rules on Disciplinary Procedure this petition was submitted to the Committee on Character and Fitness on April 17, 1987, for its investigation and recommendation.

It is the unanimous recommendation of the Committee on Character and Fitness that petitioner, Franklin W. Allen, be reinstated without limitation as a member of the South Carolina Bar, and

It is so ordered.

Gregory, Harwell and Finney, JJ., concur. Ness, C. J., and Littlejohn, Acting Associate Justice, dissent in separate opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burns v. Clayton
117 S.E.2d 300 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
361 S.E.2d 122, 293 S.C. 411, 1987 S.C. LEXIS 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-allen-sc-1987.