In re Allen

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In re Allen

60 A.3d 452, 2013 WL 451893

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 7, 2013

DocketNo. 12-BG-1915

StatusPublished

This text of 60 A.3d 452 (In re Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Allen, 60 A.3d 452, 2013 WL 451893 (D.C. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of Bar Counsel’s report regarding petitioner’s petition for reinstatement, the petition for reinstatement, and it appearing that petitioner filed his D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit on October 14, 2010, and therefore is eligible to file the petition for reinstatement, it is

ORDERED that petitioner’s petition for reinstatement is granted subject to the conditions imposed by the state of Massachusetts. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Peter A. Allen, Esquire is hereby reinstated to the Bar of the District of Columbia.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of Bar Counsel’s report regarding petitioner’s petition for reinstatement, the petition for reinstatement, and it appearing that petitioner filed his D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit on October 14, 2010, and therefore is eligible to file the petition for reinstatement, it is

ORDERED that petitioner’s petition for reinstatement is granted subject to the conditions imposed by the state of Massachusetts. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Peter A. Allen, Esquire is hereby reinstated to the Bar of the District of Columbia.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A.3d 452, 2013 WL 451893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-allen-dc-2013.