In re Allen

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In re Allen

60 A.3d 452, 2013 WL 451893

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided February 7, 2013·No. No. 12-BG-1915·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of Bar Counsel’s report regarding petitioner’s petition for reinstatement, the petition for reinstatement, and it appearing that petitioner filed his D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit on October 14, 2010, and therefore is eligible to file the petition for reinstatement, it is

ORDERED that petitioner’s petition for reinstatement is granted subject to the conditions imposed by the state of Massachusetts. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Peter A. Allen, Esquire is hereby reinstated to the Bar of the District of Columbia.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of Bar Counsel’s report regarding petitioner’s petition for reinstatement, the petition for reinstatement, and it appearing that petitioner filed his D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit on October 14, 2010, and therefore is eligible to file the petition for reinstatement, it is

ORDERED that petitioner’s petition for reinstatement is granted subject to the conditions imposed by the state of Massachusetts. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Peter A. Allen, Esquire is hereby reinstated to the Bar of the District of Columbia.

In re Allen, 60 A.3d 452, 2013 WL 451893 (D.C. 2013).

Pincite

60 A.3d 452 (In re Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.