In re Allen
This text of 546 F. App'x 270 (In re Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Iris F. Allen petitions this court for a writ mandamus, alleging that the district court unduly delayed acting on her 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2013) motion to vacate. She seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Because the district court entered an order denying Allen’s § 2255 motion on August 28, 2013, we deny the mandamus petition as moot.
PETITION DENIED.
Issues raised in Allen’s Addendum, filed after the August 28 decision, are more properly considered on direct appeal. We note that Allen's direct appeal, pending in this court as No. 13-7607, is not yet ripe for disposition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
546 F. App'x 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-allen-ca4-2013.