In re Allan

Third Circuit

In re Allan

230 F. App'x 221

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJuly 27, 2007

DocketNo. 07-2681

StatusPublished

This text of 230 F. App'x 221 (In re Allan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Allan, 230 F. App'x 221 (3d Cir. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Pro se petitioner Basem Allan seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to rule on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate. On June 15, 2007, the District Court entered an order adopting the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation and denying petitioner’s motion to vacate. Therefore, we will deny the petition for writ of mandamus as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Pro se petitioner Basem Allan seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to rule on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate. On June 15, 2007, the District Court entered an order adopting the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation and denying petitioner’s motion to vacate. Therefore, we will deny the petition for writ of mandamus as moot.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 F. App'x 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-allan-ca3-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack