in Re: All Saints Care Injury and Rehabilitation Clinic, Inc. and Jackson C. Ehioguh
This text of in Re: All Saints Care Injury and Rehabilitation Clinic, Inc. and Jackson C. Ehioguh (in Re: All Saints Care Injury and Rehabilitation Clinic, Inc. and Jackson C. Ehioguh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Denied and Opinion Filed August 27, 2021
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00223-CV
IN RE ALL SAINTS CARE INJURY AND REHABILITATION CLINIC, INC. AND JACKSON C. EHIOGUH, Relators
Original Proceeding from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-14060
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Osborne, Pedersen, III, and Goldstein Opinion by Pedersen, III In their April 7, 2021 petition for writ of mandamus, relators challenge the
trial court’s February 2, 2021 order granting real party Chase’s motion to strike
relators’ jury demand. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show that
the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that they lack an adequate appellate
remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.
proceeding).
Based on our review of the petition, real party in interest’s response, relators’
reply, and the record before us, we conclude that relators have failed to demonstrate
an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. 210223f.p05 /s/ Bill Pedersen, III BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: All Saints Care Injury and Rehabilitation Clinic, Inc. and Jackson C. Ehioguh, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-all-saints-care-injury-and-rehabilitation-clinic-inc-and-jackson-texapp-2021.