In re Alicia M.

22 A.D.3d 384, 802 N.Y.S.2d 170
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 20, 2005·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Clark V. Richardson, J.), entered on or about July 11, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from, upon a finding of abandonment, terminated appellant’s parental rights to the subject child, and committed custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[385] Petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that appellant abandoned his daughter, within the meaning of Social Services Law § 384-b (5) (a). Appellant admitted that, during the statutorily relevant period, he was incarcerated and did not attempt to contact his daughter or the agency. He does not claim that the agency discouraged or prevented him from such contact and has not shown that contact with the child was infeasible (see Matter of Anthony M., 195 AD2d 315 [1993]). Incarceration does not excuse a parent from establishing and maintaining contact with a child (see id.; and see Matter of Marie Luz C., 6 AD3d 304 [2004]; Matter of Crystal C., 222 AD2d 298 [1995]). We note that, apart from disputing the underlying finding of abandonment, appellant does not challenge the dispositional determination. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Ellerin, Williams, Catterson and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Alicia M., 22 A.D.3d 384, 802 N.Y.S.2d 170 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

22 A.D.3d 384 (In re Alicia M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Zayvion Jamel Lewis S. (Jason Frederick H.)
122 A.D.3d 546 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
In re Asia Sabrina N.
117 A.D.3d 543 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)