In Re Alicia Gonzalez and Nicole Trebilcock v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Alicia Gonzalez and Nicole Trebilcock v. the State of Texas (In Re Alicia Gonzalez and Nicole Trebilcock v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-23-00546-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
IN RE ALICIA GONZALEZ AND NICOLE TREBILCOCK
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Longoria, Silva, and Peña Memorandum Opinion by Justice Silva1
Relators Alicia Gonzalez and Nicole Trebilcock filed a petition for writ of mandamus
through which they contend that the trial court abused its discretion by granting motions
to dismiss filed by the real parties in interest, John Blaha and the Coastal Conservation
Association (CCA). See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 27.001–011 (codifying the
Texas Citizens Participation Act).
1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not
required to do so. When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case.”); id. R. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions). Mandamus is an extraordinary and discretionary remedy. See In re Allstate Indem.
Co., 622 S.W.3d 870, 883 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding); In re Garza, 544 S.W.3d 836,
840 (Tex. 2018) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam); In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148
S.W.3d 124, 138 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). The relator must show that (1) the trial
court abused its discretion, and (2) the relator lacks an adequate remedy by appeal. In re
USAA Gen. Indem. Co., 624 S.W.3d 782, 787 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding); In re
Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d at 135–36; Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833,
839–40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus,
the responses filed by Blaha and the CCA, the replies thereto filed by relators, and the
applicable law, is of the opinion that relators have not met their burden to obtain relief.
Accordingly, we lift the stay previously imposed in this cause. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10.
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
CLARISSA SILVA Justice
Delivered and filed on the 25th day of January, 2024.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Alicia Gonzalez and Nicole Trebilcock v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-alicia-gonzalez-and-nicole-trebilcock-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.