In Re Alfredo Martinez, Russell Fritsch, Herbert Griffin, Robert Isaac Garcia, Justin Wells, Matthew White, Michael Mire, Michael E. Zapata, Dorcas Michelle Bentley, Donna Michelle McLeod, Richard Mann, Rodney C. West, and Ruy Lozano v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Alfredo Martinez, Russell Fritsch, Herbert Griffin, Robert Isaac Garcia, Justin Wells, Matthew White, Michael Mire, Michael E. Zapata, Dorcas Michelle Bentley, Donna Michelle McLeod, Richard Mann, Rodney C. West, and Ruy Lozano v. the State of Texas (In Re Alfredo Martinez, Russell Fritsch, Herbert Griffin, Robert Isaac Garcia, Justin Wells, Matthew White, Michael Mire, Michael E. Zapata, Dorcas Michelle Bentley, Donna Michelle McLeod, Richard Mann, Rodney C. West, and Ruy Lozano v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed May 30, 2024.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-24-00264-CV
IN RE ALFREDO MARTINEZ, RUSSELL FRITSCH, HERBERT GRIFFIN, ROBERT ISAAC GARCIA, JUSTIN WELLS, MATTHEW WHITE, MICHAEL MIRE, MICHAEL E. ZAPATA, DORCAS MICHELLE BENTLEY, DONNA MICHELLE MCLEOD, RICHARD MANN, RODNEY C. WEST, AND RUY LOZANO, Relators
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 234th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017-42885
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On Thursday, April 11, 2024, relators Alfredo Martinez, Russell Fritsch, Herbert Griffin, Robert Isaac Garcia, Justin Wells, Matthew White, Michael Mire, Michael E. Zapata, Dorcas Michelle Bentley, Donna Michelle Mcleod, Richard Mann, Rodney C. West, and Ruy Lozano filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this court to compel the Honorable Lauren Reeder, presiding judge of the 234th District Court of Harris County, to vacate her April 4, 2024 order of severance.
Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. “[T]he res judicata effects of an action cannot preclude litigation of claims that a trial court explicitly separates or severs from that action.” Sealy Emergency Room, L.L.C. v. Free Standing Emergency Room Managers of Am., L.L.C., 685 S.W.3d 816, 823 (Tex. 2024). Thus, res judicata does not bar relators from pursuing their severed claims, and relators have an adequate remedy on appeal. We deny relators’ petition for a writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Wise, Spain, and Hassan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Alfredo Martinez, Russell Fritsch, Herbert Griffin, Robert Isaac Garcia, Justin Wells, Matthew White, Michael Mire, Michael E. Zapata, Dorcas Michelle Bentley, Donna Michelle McLeod, Richard Mann, Rodney C. West, and Ruy Lozano v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-alfredo-martinez-russell-fritsch-herbert-griffin-robert-isaac-texapp-2024.