In re Alfred R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Alfred R.

279 A.D.2d 308, 718 N.Y.S.2d 833, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 152

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 11, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 279 A.D.2d 308 (In re Alfred R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Alfred R., 279 A.D.2d 308, 718 N.Y.S.2d 833, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 152 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered on or about January 21, 1999, which, to the extent appealed from, terminated respondent father’s parental rights to the subject children upon a finding of mental illness, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In view of the history of this case and the evidence of respondent father’s mental illness dating back to 1988, his poor compliance with treatment and his failure to recognize that he was ill and needed help, and the conclusion of the court-appointed psychiatrist, that, as a result of his illness, respondent would not be able to provide proper care for the children in the foreseeable future, there was clear and convincing proof warranting termination of respondent’s parental rights pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b (4) (c) (see, Matter of Shannon Monique W., 245 AD2d 86, lv denied 91 NY2d 809). Concur — Tom, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered on or about January 21, 1999, which, to the extent appealed from, terminated respondent father’s parental rights to the subject children upon a finding of mental illness, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In view of the history of this case and the evidence of respondent father’s mental illness dating back to 1988, his poor compliance with treatment and his failure to recognize that he was ill and needed help, and the conclusion of the court-appointed psychiatrist, that, as a result of his illness, respondent would not be able to provide proper care for the children in the foreseeable future, there was clear and convincing proof warranting termination of respondent’s parental rights pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b (4) (c) (see, Matter of Shannon Monique W., 245 AD2d 86, lv denied 91 NY2d 809). Concur — Tom, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 A.D.2d 308, 718 N.Y.S.2d 833, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-alfred-r-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack