in Re Alfred Lee Stone
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Nos. 10-20-00303-CV; 10-20-00304-CV; 10-20-00305-CV; 10-20-00306-CV; 10-20-00307-CV; 10-20-00308-CV
IN RE ALFRED LEE STONE
Original Proceeding
From the 12th District Court Walker County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 12-0084; 14-0076; 18-2902; 19-29K; 20-466; 20-625C
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In one motion, Relator, Alfred Lee Stone, a prison inmate, moved to rescind the
Respondent’s order of withdrawal in these six trial court cases: 12-0084, 14-0076, 18-2902,
19-29K, 20-466, and 20-625C. According to Relator, Respondent, the trial court, refused
to rule, and the motion was returned to Relator by the District Clerk’s Office. In a petition
for writ of mandamus filed on November 24, 2020, Relator requested a mandamus from
this Court ordering Respondent to rule on Relator’s motion in all six cases. After requesting a response, we received an order from Respondent indicating that
only one of the withdrawal orders mentioned in Relator’s petition originated in
Respondent’s court; that being case number 20-466. Respondent denied Relator’s Motion
to Rescind to the extent it had jurisdiction.
Accordingly, Relator’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus pertaining to case number
20-466, that being docket number 10-20-00307-CV, is dismissed as moot.
Because the remaining petitions for writ of mandamus were directed toward
Respondent’s failure to rule on motions not pending in Respondent’s court and thus not
within Respondent’s jurisdiction, those petitions, numbered 10-20-00303-CV, 10-20-
00304-CV, 10-20-00305-CV, 10-20-00306-CV, and 10-20-00308-CV, are denied.
TOM GRAY Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Neill, and Justice Johnson Petition dismissed Petitions denied Opinion delivered and filed January 20, 2021 [OT06]
In re Stone Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Alfred Lee Stone (in Re Alfred Lee Stone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.