In Re: Alfred J. Vincent

86 F.3d 1154, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 42314, 1996 WL 267293
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In Re: Alfred J. Vincent. Read the opinion of the Court — 105 F.3d 943
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 21, 1996·No. 96-508·Unpublished

Opinion

86 F.3d 1154

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
In Re: Alfred J. VINCENT, Petitioner.

No. 96-508.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 16, 1996.
Decided: May 21, 1996.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-75-23-W)

Alfred J. Vincent, Petitioner Pro Se.

PETITION DENIED.

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Alfred J. Vincent's petition for mandamus is meritless and is therefore denied. His motions for appointment of counsel, for recusal of members of this court, for dismissal of No. 81-1513, for certification of questions to the Supreme Court, and to vacate a district court judgment are also denied for lack of merit. Finally, because no member of the court has requested a poll, Vincent's motion for hearing en banc is denied. We also deny Vincent's motions for in forma pauperis status and for oral argument and "Request for Hearing" because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re: Alfred J. Vincent, 86 F.3d 1154, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 42314, 1996 WL 267293 (4th Cir. 1996).

86 F.3d 1154 (In Re: Alfred J. Vincent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.