In re Alfred B. Angel Guardian Home

212 A.D.2d 529, 622 N.Y.S.2d 297
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 6, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 212 A.D.2d 529 (In re Alfred B. Angel Guardian Home) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Alfred B. Angel Guardian Home, 212 A.D.2d 529, 622 N.Y.S.2d 297 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b and Family Court Act article 6 to terminate parental rights, the mother appeals from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Schechter, J.), dated August 23, 1991, as, after a dispositional hearing, granted the petition and terminated her parental rights.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court terminated the appellant’s parental rights on the grounds: (1) that she failed to successfully complete a drug rehabilitation program and (2) that she permanently neglected her child within the meaning of Social Services Law § 384-b. However, because the first ground alone is sufficient to sustain the court’s decision, only the respondent’s drug use will be addressed.

The facts adduced at the hearing reveal a long history of admitted and discovered illegal drug use by the appellant and many failed attempts at rehabilitation. Her attendance at various drug rehabilitation programs was generally sporadic and her efforts to control her habit were marked by serious lapses. Indeed, the appellant tested positive for cocaine use six months after the petition to terminate her parental rights was filed. Thus, the Family Court properly ordered her parental rights terminated (see, Matter of Regina M. C., 139 AD2d 929). Ritter, J. P., Copertino, Joy and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Corey S.
112 A.D.3d 641 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
212 A.D.2d 529, 622 N.Y.S.2d 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-alfred-b-angel-guardian-home-nyappdiv-1995.