In Re: Alfonzo Avery Blackburn

37 F.3d 1492, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34794, 1994 WL 564688
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 17, 1994
Docket94-8032
StatusPublished

This text of 37 F.3d 1492 (In Re: Alfonzo Avery Blackburn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Alfonzo Avery Blackburn, 37 F.3d 1492, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34794, 1994 WL 564688 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

37 F.3d 1492
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

In Re: Alfonzo Avery BLACKBURN, Petitioner.

No. 94-8032.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 25, 1994.
Decided Oct. 17, 1994.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Alfonzo Avery Blackburn, Petitioner Pro Se.

PETITION DENIED.

Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Alfonzo Blackburn, a federal prisoner, brought this petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to vacate a sentence that Blackburn alleges was erroneously calculated. Mandamus relief is only available when there are no other means by which the relief sought could be granted. In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987). Blackburn forfeited appellate review of his conviction and sentence by voluntarily withdrawing his direct appeal and by failing to timely appeal the district court's denial of his subsequent motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988). Because mandamus cannot be used as a substitute for appeal, In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir.1979), we deny Blackburn's petition. We also grant Blackburn leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny his motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc
595 F.2d 958 (Fourth Circuit, 1979)
In Re Diana R. Beard, (Two Cases)
811 F.2d 818 (Fourth Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 F.3d 1492, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34794, 1994 WL 564688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-alfonzo-avery-blackburn-ca4-1994.