In Re Alfonso Espinoza Gonzalez v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 26, 2023·No. 04-23-00182-CR·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 26, 2023

No. 04-23-00182-CR

IN RE Alfonso Espinoza GONZALEZ

Original Proceeding 1

ORDER

On March 6, 2023, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator also filed a motion for stay of the underlying proceedings pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus, which this court granted in part on March 8, 2023.

After considering the petition, real party in interest’s response, and this record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the complaint raised in relator’s petition for writ of mandamus that the trial court failed to rule on his application for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED as moot. The complaint raised in relator’s petition for writ of mandamus that the trial court failed to rule on his motion to urge is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The stay imposed on March 8, 2023 is LIFTED.

It is so ORDERED on April 26, 2023.

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 26th day of April, 2023.

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 13514CR, styled State of Texas v. Ramiro Cordova Garcia, pending in the County Court, Kinney County, Texas, the Honorable Todd Alexander Blomerth and the Honorable Susan Reed presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Alfonso Espinoza Gonzalez v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

In Re Alfonso Espinoza Gonzalez v. the State of Texas (In Re Alfonso Espinoza Gonzalez v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.