In re Alexander

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Alexander

407 S.E.2d 907, 305 S.C. 187, 1991 S.C. LEXIS 184

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedAugust 16, 1991

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 407 S.E.2d 907 (In re Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Alexander, 407 S.E.2d 907, 305 S.C. 187, 1991 S.C. LEXIS 184 (S.C. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Respondent is an attorney licensed to practice law in South Carolina and has petitioned this Court to be transferred to disability inactive status pursuant to Paragraph 19 of Rule 413, SCACR, because he has become unable to continue to practice law.

The petition is granted and respondent is transferred to disability inactive status until further order of this Court. El-dridge Inman, Esquire, is appointed pursuant to Paragraph 33 of Rule 413, SCACR, to protect the interests of respondent and his clients.

This Order, when served on any bank maintaining a trust and/or escrow account of respondent, will serve as notice to the bank that Eldridge Inman has been duly appointed by this Court.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI