in Re Alex Melvin Wade Junior

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 8, 2018
Docket14-18-00138-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Alex Melvin Wade Junior (in Re Alex Melvin Wade Junior) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Alex Melvin Wade Junior, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 8, 2018.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-18-00138-CV

IN RE ALEX MELVIN WADE JR., Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 151st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017-39002

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 21, 2018, relator Alex Melvin Wade, Jr. filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West Supp. 2017); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Mike Engelhart, presiding judge of the 151st District Court of Harris County, to recuse himself. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 18a. As the party seeking relief, relator has the burden of providing this court with a sufficient record to establish his right to mandamus relief. See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding); Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a)(1) (relator must file with petition “a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding”). “A party’s right to mandamus relief generally requires a predicate request for some action and a refusal of that request.” In re Perritt, 992 S.W.2d 444, 446 (Tex. 1999) (orig. proceeding); In re Le, 335 S.W.3d 808, 814–15 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, no pet.). Relator is not entitled to mandamus relief because he has not provided this court with a certified or sworn copy of his motion to recuse or a record which shows that the motion was refused.

We therefore deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Busby, Brown, and Jewell.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Le
335 S.W.3d 808 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011)
In Re Perritt
992 S.W.2d 444 (Texas Supreme Court, 1999)
Walker v. Packer
827 S.W.2d 833 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Alex Melvin Wade Junior, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-alex-melvin-wade-junior-texapp-2018.