In Re Alex G.

978 A.2d 1088, 2009 WL 2994551
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided August 31, 2009·No. 09-36-A·Published

Opinion

CORRECTED ORDER

This is respondent juvenile Alex G.’s appeal from a Family Court adjudication that he was wayward. The adjudication was based for the most part upon offensive speech deemed by the trial judge to have constituted a violation of § 11 — 45—1 (a)(2). The state, however, has now submitted a confession of error conceding that the Family Court judge erred in his determination and that under State v. Tavarozzi, 446 A.2d 1048 (R.I.1982), a finding of waywardness on these facts was constitutionally impermissible.

Accordingly, pursuant to the confession of error, the respondent’s appeal is sustained. The wayward adjudication is hereby reversed, and the papers in the case are ordered returned to the Family Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Alex G., 978 A.2d 1088, 2009 WL 2994551 (R.I. 2009).

978 A.2d 1088 (In Re Alex G.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Tavarozzi
446 A.2d 1048 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1982)