In Re Alex G.
This text of 978 A.2d 1088 (In Re Alex G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CORRECTED ORDER
This is respondent juvenile Alex G.’s appeal from a Family Court adjudication that he was wayward. The adjudication was based for the most part upon offensive speech deemed by the trial judge to have constituted a violation of § 11 — 45—1 (a)(2). The state, however, has now submitted a confession of error conceding that the Family Court judge erred in his determination and that under State v. Tavarozzi, 446 A.2d 1048 (R.I.1982), a finding of waywardness on these facts was constitutionally impermissible.
Accordingly, pursuant to the confession of error, the respondent’s appeal is sustained. The wayward adjudication is hereby reversed, and the papers in the case are ordered returned to the Family Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
978 A.2d 1088, 2009 WL 2994551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-alex-g-ri-2009.