in Re: Alejandrina Lopez

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 8, 2022
Docket05-22-00711-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Alejandrina Lopez (in Re: Alejandrina Lopez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Alejandrina Lopez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 8, 2022

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00710-CV No. 05-22-00711-CV

IN RE ALEJANDRINA LOPEZ, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 301st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. DF-21-11690 and DF-22-04960

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Osborne, Partida-Kipness, and Smith Opinion by Justice Smith Relator Alejandrina Lopez petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus

compelling the trial court to vacate her June 6, 2022 Order on Bill of Review and

Motion for New Trial where the trial court granted a new trial and set aside a Final

Decree of Divorce dated December 28, 2021.

By order dated July 27, 2022, we informed relator that her petition and

appendix in these proceedings contained unredacted sensitive information, including

the minors’ names and birthdates, in violation of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

9.9. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.9. We struck relator’s petition and appendix and granted

relator leave to re-file a petition and appendix that complied with rule 9.9 on or before August 3, 2022. We cautioned relator that a failure to re-file as permitted by

our order might result in dismissal of this cause without further notice.

On August 1, 2022, relator filed her Amended Petition for Writ of Mandamus

and Brief in Support Thereof, which included an attached Appendix (together,

Amended Petition) in these proceedings. Relator, however, failed to redact all

sensitive information as ordered by the Court; the Amended Petition still contains

instances where sensitive information remains unredacted, including the minors’

names.

Accordingly, because relator has not filed a petition and appendix that

complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.9 as ordered by this Court, we

STRIKE relator’s Amended Petition and DISMISS these original proceedings. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c), 52.8(a).

/Craig Smith/ CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE 220710F.P05

–2–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Alejandrina Lopez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-alejandrina-lopez-texapp-2022.