In Re Aldo R. Santos v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Aldo R. Santos v. the State of Texas (In Re Aldo R. Santos v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-23-00574-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
IN RE ALDO R. SANTOS
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras1
By petition for writ of mandamus, relator Aldo R. Santos contends that the trial
court abused its discretion by determining that a premarital agreement was
unconscionable and that “mandamus relief [is] warranted to avoid expensive and
pointless litigation over issues controlled by the [premarital agreement].”
1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not
required to do so. When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case.”); id. R. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions). Mandamus is an extraordinary and discretionary remedy. See In re Allstate Indem.
Co., 622 S.W.3d 870, 883 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding); In re Garza, 544 S.W.3d 836,
840 (Tex. 2018) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam); In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148
S.W.3d 124, 138 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). The relator must show that (1) the trial
court abused its discretion, and (2) the relator lacks an adequate remedy by appeal. In re
USAA Gen. Indem. Co., 624 S.W.3d 782, 787 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding); In re
Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d at 135–36; Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833,
839–40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus,
the response filed by real party in interest Marlene Rico Villanueva, relator’s reply, and
the applicable law, is of the opinion that relator has not met his burden to obtain relief.
Accordingly, we lift the stay previously imposed in this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10.
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
DORI CONTRERAS Chief Justice
Delivered and filed on the 28th day of February, 2024.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Aldo R. Santos v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-aldo-r-santos-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.