In re Alderman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Alderman

92 A.D.2d 576, 460 N.Y.S.2d 278, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16823

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 18, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 92 A.D.2d 576 (In re Alderman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Alderman, 92 A.D.2d 576, 460 N.Y.S.2d 278, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16823 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Motion by Bernard Alderman, a suspended attorney, for reinstatement as an attorney' and counselor at law, his period of suspension having expired. The matter was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Second and [577]*577Eleventh Judicial Districts to investigate and report on (1) whether petitioner complied with this court’s suspension order and (2) whether he presently possesses the requisite character and fitness for an attorney and counselor at law. The committee’s report has been received by this court. The committee finds that petitioner has complied with this court’s order and presently possesses the requisite character and fitness and recommends that he be reinstated. This court accepts the committee’s report and recommendation and directs that petitioner Bernard Alderman be reinstated and the clerk of this court is directed to restore his name to the roll of attorneys and counselors at law, forthwith. Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Lazer, Mangano and Gibbons, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Motion by Bernard Alderman, a suspended attorney, for reinstatement as an attorney' and counselor at law, his period of suspension having expired. The matter was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Second and [577]*577Eleventh Judicial Districts to investigate and report on (1) whether petitioner complied with this court’s suspension order and (2) whether he presently possesses the requisite character and fitness for an attorney and counselor at law. The committee’s report has been received by this court. The committee finds that petitioner has complied with this court’s order and presently possesses the requisite character and fitness and recommends that he be reinstated. This court accepts the committee’s report and recommendation and directs that petitioner Bernard Alderman be reinstated and the clerk of this court is directed to restore his name to the roll of attorneys and counselors at law, forthwith. Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Lazer, Mangano and Gibbons, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 A.D.2d 576, 460 N.Y.S.2d 278, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-alderman-nyappdiv-1983.