In re Alcantara

177 A.3d 808, 232 N.J. 37
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 8, 2018·No. D–79 September Term 2017; 080639·Published

Opinion

JOSE DAVID ALCANTARA of ATLANTIC CITY , who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1988, having been found guilty after a trial by jury in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Atlantic County, of endangering the welfare of a child under 16 years of age, in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4, a second-degree offense, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1:20-13 (b)(1), JOSE DAVID ALCANTARA is temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the final resolution of ethics proceedings against him, effective *809immediately and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that JOSE DAVID ALCANTARA be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that JOSE DAVID ALCANTARA comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this state.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Alcantara, 177 A.3d 808, 232 N.J. 37 (N.J. 2018).

177 A.3d 808 (In re Alcantara) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.