In Re Albert T. McNeal v. the State of Texas

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)·Decided January 15, 2026·No. 01-26-00030-CR·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued January 15, 2026

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-26-00030-CR NO. 01-26-00031-CR NO. 01-26-00032-CR NO. 01-26-00033-CR ——————————— IN RE ALBERT T. MCNEAL, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator Albert T. McNeal has filed a petition for writ of mandamus,

complaining that the trial court has refused to consider his application for writ of

habeas corpus.1

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). We

deny all outstanding motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Rivas-Molloy, Guiney, and Morgan.

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

1 The underlying case is The State of Texas v. Albert T. McNeal, cause numbers 1730431, 1730463, 1758344, & 1758345, pending in the 230th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Chris Morton presiding. 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Albert T. McNeal v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

In Re Albert T. McNeal v. the State of Texas (In Re Albert T. McNeal v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.