in Re Albert F. Haarmann

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 4, 2015
Docket09-15-00028-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Albert F. Haarmann (in Re Albert F. Haarmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Albert F. Haarmann, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-15-00028-CR ____________________

IN RE ALBERT F. HAARMANN

_______________________________________________________ ______________

Original Proceeding ________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Albert F. Haarmann filed an original and amended petition for writ of

mandamus, asking this Court to order his trial counsel to give Haarmann his case

file in Cause Number 8843 in the 411th District Court of San Jacinto County. 1

Neither petition invoke this Court’s mandamus jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code

Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004) (A court of appeals may issue a writ of mandamus

against a judge of a district or county court in the court’s district, or issue a writ

1 Cause Number 8843 was affirmed on appeal and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals subsequently denied Haarmann’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. See Ex parte Haarmann, No. WR-74213-01, 2010 WL 3430873, at *1 (Tex. Crim. App. Aug. 25, 2010) (order, not designated for publication). 1 that is necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of the court.). Accordingly, we dismiss

the petition for writ of mandamus.

PETITION DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on February 3, 2015 Opinion Delivered February 4, 2015 Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Albert F. Haarmann, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-albert-f-haarmann-texapp-2015.