in Re Albert F. Haarmann
This text of in Re Albert F. Haarmann (in Re Albert F. Haarmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-15-00028-CR ____________________
IN RE ALBERT F. HAARMANN
_______________________________________________________ ______________
Original Proceeding ________________________________________________________ _____________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Albert F. Haarmann filed an original and amended petition for writ of
mandamus, asking this Court to order his trial counsel to give Haarmann his case
file in Cause Number 8843 in the 411th District Court of San Jacinto County. 1
Neither petition invoke this Court’s mandamus jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code
Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004) (A court of appeals may issue a writ of mandamus
against a judge of a district or county court in the court’s district, or issue a writ
1 Cause Number 8843 was affirmed on appeal and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals subsequently denied Haarmann’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. See Ex parte Haarmann, No. WR-74213-01, 2010 WL 3430873, at *1 (Tex. Crim. App. Aug. 25, 2010) (order, not designated for publication). 1 that is necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of the court.). Accordingly, we dismiss
the petition for writ of mandamus.
PETITION DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on February 3, 2015 Opinion Delivered February 4, 2015 Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Albert F. Haarmann, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-albert-f-haarmann-texapp-2015.