In re Albert C.

California Supreme Court

In re Albert C.

365 P.3d 789, 198 Cal. Rptr. 3d 821

California Supreme Court·Decided February 24, 2016·No. No. S231315.·Published

Opinion

The petition for review is granted. The issues to be briefed and argued are limited to the following: Did the juvenile court violate minor's due process rights by detaining him well past the 120-day limit established in the Los Angeles County Superior Court Juvenile Division's "Amended Competency to Stand Trial Protocol" (Protocol), without evidence of progress toward attaining competency? Does a violation of the Protocol establish a presumption of a due process violation?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition for review is granted. The issues to be briefed and argued are limited to the following: Did the juvenile court violate minor's due process rights by detaining him well past the 120-day limit established in the Los Angeles County Superior Court Juvenile Division's "Amended Competency to Stand Trial Protocol" (Protocol), without evidence of progress toward attaining competency? Does a violation of the Protocol establish a presumption of a due process violation?

In re Albert C., 365 P.3d 789, 198 Cal. Rptr. 3d 821 (Cal. 2016).

Pincite

365 P.3d 789 (In re Albert C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.