In re Albert C.

California Supreme Court

In re Albert C.

365 P.3d 789, 198 Cal. Rptr. 3d 821

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 24, 2016

DocketNo. S231315.

StatusPublished

This text of 365 P.3d 789 (In re Albert C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Albert C., 365 P.3d 789, 198 Cal. Rptr. 3d 821 (Cal. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

The petition for review is granted. The issues to be briefed and argued are limited to the following: Did the juvenile court violate minor's due process rights by detaining him well past the 120-day limit established in the Los Angeles County Superior Court Juvenile Division's "Amended Competency to Stand Trial Protocol" (Protocol), without evidence of progress toward attaining competency? Does a violation of the Protocol establish a presumption of a due process violation?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition for review is granted. The issues to be briefed and argued are limited to the following: Did the juvenile court violate minor's due process rights by detaining him well past the 120-day limit established in the Los Angeles County Superior Court Juvenile Division's "Amended Competency to Stand Trial Protocol" (Protocol), without evidence of progress toward attaining competency? Does a violation of the Protocol establish a presumption of a due process violation?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

365 P.3d 789, 198 Cal. Rptr. 3d 821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-albert-c-cal-2016.