In re Alario
This text of 203 So. 3d 217 (In re Alario) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING
hOn February 22, 2013, we accepted a petition for consent discipline and suspended respondent, Alan Dean Alario, II, for a period of one year and one day, fully deferred, subject to the conditions set forth in the petition for consent discipline. In re: Alario, 13-0166 (La. 2/22/13), 109 So.3d 344 (“Alario I”). In this matter, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel jointly seek to make the deferred suspension executory. The parties represent that respondent is no longer in compliance with the conditions placed on the deferral of his suspension in Alario I, and he no longer wishes to comply with these conditions, so he freely and voluntarily consents to the imposition of his previously deferred suspension.
We agree that under these circumstances, the imposition of Alario I’s fully deferred one year and one day suspension is warranted. Accordingly, we will make the previously deferred suspension immediately executory.
DECREE
For the reasons assigned, the previously deferred suspension imposed in In re: Alario, 13-0166 (La. 2/22/13), 109 So.3d 344, is hereby made immediately executo-ry. All costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent, Alan D. Alario, II, Louisiana Bar Roll number 26780, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
203 So. 3d 217, 2016 La. LEXIS 2138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-alario-la-2016.