in Re Alan and Audrey Merin
This text of in Re Alan and Audrey Merin (in Re Alan and Audrey Merin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-14-00433-CV
IN RE Alan and Audrey MERIN
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: June 25, 2014
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On June 19, 2014, relators Alan and Audrey Merin filed a petition for writ of mandamus
complaining of the trial court’s discovery orders and an emergency motion for stay pending a
ruling on the mandamus petition. The court has considered the petition for writ of mandamus and
is of the opinion that relators are not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ
of mandamus and the emergency motion for stay are denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2013-CI-12338, styled Alan Merin and Audrey Merin v. Scott Tschirhart; The Tschirhart Law Firm, PC; Gary Gibson; Carabin and Shaw, PC; David Earl; Earl & Associates, PC; David Navarro; Hornberger Sheehan Fuller Beiter Wittenberg & Garza, pending in the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable David A. Canales presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Alan and Audrey Merin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-alan-and-audrey-merin-texapp-2014.