in Re Alan and Audrey Merin

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 25, 2014·No. 04-14-00433-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00433-CV

IN RE Alan and Audrey MERIN

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 25, 2014

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On June 19, 2014, relators Alan and Audrey Merin filed a petition for writ of mandamus

complaining of the trial court’s discovery orders and an emergency motion for stay pending a

ruling on the mandamus petition. The court has considered the petition for writ of mandamus and

is of the opinion that relators are not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ

of mandamus and the emergency motion for stay are denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2013-CI-12338, styled Alan Merin and Audrey Merin v. Scott Tschirhart; The Tschirhart Law Firm, PC; Gary Gibson; Carabin and Shaw, PC; David Earl; Earl & Associates, PC; David Navarro; Hornberger Sheehan Fuller Beiter Wittenberg & Garza, pending in the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable David A. Canales presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Alan and Audrey Merin, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

in Re Alan and Audrey Merin (in Re Alan and Audrey Merin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.