in Re Alamex, Nv

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 20, 2012·No. 13-12-00030-CV·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-12-00030-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE ALAMEX, NV

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion1

Relator, Alamex, NV, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for

emergency stay in the above cause on January 19, 2012.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of

mandamus and the motion for emergency stay, is of the opinion that relator has not

shown itself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions). mandamus and motion for emergency stay are DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 20th day of January, 2012.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Alamex, Nv, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

in Re Alamex, Nv (in Re Alamex, Nv) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.