in Re Alamex, Nv
This text of in Re Alamex, Nv (in Re Alamex, Nv) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-12-00030-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE ALAMEX, NV
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion1
Relator, Alamex, NV, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for
emergency stay in the above cause on January 19, 2012.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of
mandamus and the motion for emergency stay, is of the opinion that relator has not
shown itself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of
1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions). mandamus and motion for emergency stay are DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 20th day of January, 2012.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Alamex, Nv, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-alamex-nv-texapp-2012.