In re Alaimo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Alaimo

16 A.D.2d 814, 228 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9572

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 21, 1962

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 A.D.2d 814 (In re Alaimo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Alaimo, 16 A.D.2d 814, 228 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9572 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding against an infant pursuant to the Children’s Court Act of the State of New York, the infant appeals from a judgment of the Children’s Court, Rockland County, rendered June 8, 1961, after a hearing, which adjudicated him to be a juvenile delinquent by reason of his violation of section 555 of the Penal Law, relating to malicious telephone calls. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, and petition dismissed. The allegations of the petition were neither established by a preponderance of evidence nor in accordance with the customary rules of evidence (cf. People v. Lewis, 260 N. Y. 171, cert, denied, 289 U. S. 709). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding against an infant pursuant to the Children’s Court Act of the State of New York, the infant appeals from a judgment of the Children’s Court, Rockland County, rendered June 8, 1961, after a hearing, which adjudicated him to be a juvenile delinquent by reason of his violation of section 555 of the Penal Law, relating to malicious telephone calls. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, and petition dismissed. The allegations of the petition were neither established by a preponderance of evidence nor in accordance with the customary rules of evidence (cf. People v. Lewis, 260 N. Y. 171, cert, denied, 289 U. S. 709). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 814, 228 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-alaimo-nyappdiv-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack