in Re: Al Williams
This text of in Re: Al Williams (in Re: Al Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENY and Opinion Filed July 21, 2022
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00688-CV
IN RE AL WILLIAMS, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-17458
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Osborne, Partida-Kipness, and Smith Opinion by Justice Smith In this original proceeding, relator asks us to issue a writ of mandamus
compelling the trial court to rule on outstanding motions and provide findings of
facts and conclusions of law. Relator also asks us to issue a writ of mandamus
compelling the court of appeals to abate his related appeal, supplement the record,
and add CWS Towing as a party.
Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court
clearly abused its discretion and that he lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re
Copart, Inc., 619 S.W.3d 710, 713 (Tex. 2021) (per curium) (orig. proceeding)
(citing In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.
proceeding)). We conclude that relator has failed to comply with most of the requirements under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52, and, without a record,
we are unable to meaningfully review relator’s claims. Further, to the extent relator
seeks a writ of mandamus against the court of appeals, we lack authority to grant
such relief. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(b). Accordingly, we deny the
petition.
/Craig Smith/ CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE
220688F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Al Williams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-al-williams-texapp-2022.