In Re A.J. Vincent, M.D.
This text of 861 F.2d 267 (In Re A.J. Vincent, M.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
861 F.2d 267
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
In re A.J. VINCENT, M.D., Petitioner.
No. 88-1731.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 29, 1988.
Decided: Oct. 20, 1988.
A.J. Vincent, petitioner pro se.
Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL and JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Alfred J. Vincent, M.D., has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in which he claims that the district court has not complied with this Court's mandate in Vincent v. Reynolds Memorial Hosp., Inc., 728 F.2d 250 (4th Cir.1984). Vincent has also appealed the district court's decision against him following our remand in that case. As Vincent will be able to raise any questions about the propriety of the district court's actions in his pending appeal, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. See In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir.1979) (petition for writ of mandamus may not be used as substitute for appeal).
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
861 F.2d 267, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 15747, 1988 WL 113003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-aj-vincent-md-ca4-1988.