In Re Airstream, Inc. and RV Retailer Texas II LLC D/B/A Blue Compass RV v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 3, 2025
Docket03-24-00787-CV
StatusPublished

This text of In Re Airstream, Inc. and RV Retailer Texas II LLC D/B/A Blue Compass RV v. the State of Texas (In Re Airstream, Inc. and RV Retailer Texas II LLC D/B/A Blue Compass RV v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Airstream, Inc. and RV Retailer Texas II LLC D/B/A Blue Compass RV v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-24-00787-CV

In re Airstream, Inc. and RV Retailer Texas II LLC d/b/a Blue Compass RV

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Relators have filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s

order denying their motion to dismiss. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. After signing the order denying

the motion to dismiss, the respondent judge, the Honorable Madeleine Connor, left office as the

presiding judge of the 353rd District Court of Travis County.

Under Rule 7.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, when a public officer

ceases to hold office, “[i]f the case is an original proceeding under Rule 52, the court must abate

the proceeding to allow the successor to reconsider the original party’s decision.” Id. R. 7.2(b);

see also In re Gonzales, 391 S.W.3d 251, 252 (Tex. App.—Austin 2012, orig. proceeding)

(explaining underlying policy rationale behind Rule 7.2(b), which is to afford successor judge an

opportunity to rule on relator’s complaint before appellate court considers mandamus petition).

Accordingly, we abate this mandamus petition for thirty days and instruct the

successor judge to prepare and send to this Court her ruling on the motion to dismiss no later than April 2, 2025. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(b) (noting appellate court may grant any just temporary

relief pending appellate court’s action on mandamus petition).

It is so ordered on March 3, 2025.

Before Justices Triana, Theofanis, and Crump

Abated and Remanded

Filed: March 3, 2025

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

in Re Henry Gonzales, Jr.
391 S.W.3d 251 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re Airstream, Inc. and RV Retailer Texas II LLC D/B/A Blue Compass RV v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-airstream-inc-and-rv-retailer-texas-ii-llc-dba-blue-compass-rv-v-texapp-2025.