In Re Airlift International, Inc.

92 B.R. 550, 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 1733
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.
DecidedOctober 27, 1988
Docket18-11303
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 92 B.R. 550 (In Re Airlift International, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Airlift International, Inc., 92 B.R. 550, 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 1733 (Fla. 1988).

Opinion

ORDER ON U.S. TRUSTEE’S OBJECTION TO PLAN OF REORGANIZATION

SIDNEY M. WEAVER, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter came before the Court for hearing on Thursday, October 20, 1988, at 10:30 a.m. on the Emergency Motion and Memorandum of Law by U.S. Trustee Requesting Ruling on Objections to Plan of Reorganization (the “Motion”). The Court heard the arguments of the U.S. Trustee, the Trustee, the Creditors’ Committee, and other parties in interest.

William D. Seidle, the trustee of the debt- or’s estate, filed an amended plan of reorganization which, inter alia, designated Mr. Seidle to be one of five members of the board of directors of the reorganized debt- or and to be chairman of the board with an annual salary of $75,000 and eligible to participate in a stock option plan for employees. The U.S. Trustee filed the Motion objecting to these aspects of the plan.

While the Court recognizes Mr. Seidle’s abilities and experience and does not impute any improper motive to Mr. Seidle, the Court finds that by designating himself chairman of the board of the reorganized debtor, Mr. Seidle, as a trustee owing fiduciary obligations to the debtor’s estate and its creditors, would place himself in a position of the appearance of a conflict of interest, which public policy cannot allow. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Motion is granted in part; that William D. Seidle may not serve as an officer or director, or acquire any stock, of the reorganized debtor for a period of six months commencing on the effective date of any confirmed plan of reorganization of this debtor; and that the Trustee is hereby directed to amend the plan and disclosure statement consistent with the terms of this Order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Interamericas, Ltd.
321 B.R. 830 (S.D. Texas, 2005)
In Re Gem Tire & Service Co.
117 B.R. 874 (S.D. Texas, 1990)
In Re Greenley Energy Holdings of Pennsylvania, Inc.
94 B.R. 854 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 B.R. 550, 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 1733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-airlift-international-inc-flsb-1988.