In re Ainsworth

5 F. Supp. 522, 1933 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1067
District Court, S.D. Texas·Decided November 29, 1933·No. No. 488·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

KENNERLY, District Judge.

Walker-Craig Company (hereinafter called creditor) are here on briefs of their counsel, complaining of an order (not sent up) of a referee in bankruptcy, dated October 20, 1933, with respect to- their claim against this estate. No petition for review such as is required by Supreme Court General Order 27 (11 USCA § 53)1 appears to have been filed, but creditor delivered to the referee a paper excepting to the ruling of the referee, and giving notice of appeal to the judge of the court. The referee did not file [523]*523the paper, hut both he and the trustee waived “Notice of Appeal.” 2

The referee transmits findings of fact and conclusions of law. These have not been filed by tbe clerk, but were doubtless intended by tbe referee to meet tbe requirements of General Order 27 that tbe referee “certify to the judge the question presented, a summary of the evidence relating thereto, and tbe finding and order of the referee thereon.”

1. There is first presented tbe question of whether tbe judge of tbe court has, by these proceedings, acquired jurisdiction to review the referee’s order complained of. That a mere exception to, and notice of appeal from, a referee’s order does not confer such jurisdiction is clear. Tbe proceedings will be dismissed.

2. Since no petition to review has been filed, and that justice may be done, creditor should not be precluded by this dismissal from seasonably filing such petition. Creditor may do so if filed within five days.

Let an order be presented accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Ainsworth, 5 F. Supp. 522, 1933 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1067 (S.D. Tex. 1933).

5 F. Supp. 522 (In re Ainsworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Ainsworth
5 F. Supp. 523 (S.D. Texas, 1933)