In re Ainsley

1 Edw. Ch. 576, 1833 N.Y. LEXIS 210, 1833 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 11
CourtNew York Court of Chancery
DecidedApril 2, 1833
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Edw. Ch. 576 (In re Ainsley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Ainsley, 1 Edw. Ch. 576, 1833 N.Y. LEXIS 210, 1833 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 11 (N.Y. 1833).

Opinion

A' receiver, in bringing suit, is not to employ the solicitor or counsel of . any of the parties or persons interested in the property.

Upon .an application of the receiver (petitioner) for authority bring an action in relation to personal property : The Vice-Chancellor directed it to be done; and ordered, that the receiver should be at liberty to employ such attorney and counsel as he might think proper; other than the attorney, solicitor or counsel who had been concerned in the suit wherein the petitioner was appointed and other than the attorney or counsel of the persons holding the property or interested therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fassett v. Tallmadge
14 Abb. Pr. 188 (New York Supreme Court, 1860)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Edw. Ch. 576, 1833 N.Y. LEXIS 210, 1833 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ainsley-nychanct-1833.