in Re Aimee Woolwine
This text of in Re Aimee Woolwine (in Re Aimee Woolwine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 28, 2022.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-22-00260-CV
IN RE AIMEE WOOLWINE, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 312th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021-05391
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On April 11, 2022, relator Aimee Woolwine filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Clinton E. Wells, Jr., presiding judge of the 312th District Court of Harris County, to vacate the trial court’s February 2, 2022 oral order setting aside the Mediated Settlement Agreement (“MSA”) and ordering the parties back to mediation. Relator further requests that this Court direct the trial court to enter judgment on the terms of the MSA and to sign the proposed final divorce decree submitted to the trial court by relator with her motion to enter final decree of divorce.
Relator has not established that she is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Zimmerer, and Hassan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Aimee Woolwine, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-aimee-woolwine-texapp-2022.