In re A.I.

Ohio Supreme Court

In re A.I.

3 N.E.3d 209, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1407

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 12, 2014·No. 2014-0211·Published

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 100074. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for leave to redact, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Appellant shall come to the Supreme Court of Ohio clerk’s office and redact all personal identifiers, as defined by Sup.R. 44(H) and S.Ct.Prae.R. 8.6, from the appendix of exhibits filed in this ease within 10 days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 100074. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for leave to redact, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Appellant shall come to the Supreme Court of Ohio clerk’s office and redact all personal identifiers, as defined by Sup.R. 44(H) and S.Ct.Prae.R. 8.6, from the appendix of exhibits filed in this ease within 10 days of the date of this entry.

In re A.I., 3 N.E.3d 209, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1407 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

3 N.E.3d 209 (In re A.I.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.