In re A.I.

Ohio Supreme Court

In re A.I.

3 N.E.3d 209, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1407

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 12, 2014

Docket2014-0211

StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.E.3d 209 (In re A.I.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re A.I., 3 N.E.3d 209, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1407 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 100074. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for leave to redact, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Appellant shall come to the Supreme Court of Ohio clerk’s office and redact all personal identifiers, as defined by Sup.R. 44(H) and S.Ct.Prae.R. 8.6, from the appendix of exhibits filed in this ease within 10 days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 100074. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for leave to redact, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Appellant shall come to the Supreme Court of Ohio clerk’s office and redact all personal identifiers, as defined by Sup.R. 44(H) and S.Ct.Prae.R. 8.6, from the appendix of exhibits filed in this ease within 10 days of the date of this entry.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 N.E.3d 209, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ai-ohio-2014.