In re Aguilar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Aguilar

115 A.D.3d 1151, 982 N.Y.S.2d 790

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 27, 2014

StatusPublished

This text of 115 A.D.3d 1151 (In re Aguilar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Aguilar, 115 A.D.3d 1151, 982 N.Y.S.2d 790 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1990. By order of the Florida Supreme Court, dated October 29, 1992, respondent, a Florida attorney, was disbarred from the practice of law in Florida, without leave to reapply for 20 years. By order entered December 31, 1992, this Court also disbarred respondent (Matter of Aguilar, 188 AD2d 998 [1992]). He now applies for reinstatement. Petitioner opposes the motion.

Because we conclude that respondent has not demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that he has complied with the provisions of the order disbarring him and that he possesses the character and general fitness to resume the practice of law (see [1152]*115222 NYCRR 806.12 [b]), we deny the application for reinstatement.

Stein, J.E, Garry, Rose and Egan Jr., JJ., concur.

Ordered that respondent’s application for reinstatement is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI