In re Agrapidis

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Agrapidis

905 A.2d 863, 188 N.J. 248, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 1310

DecidedSeptember 6, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 905 A.2d 863 (In re Agrapidis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Agrapidis, 905 A.2d 863, 188 N.J. 248, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 1310 (N.J. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-083, concluding that EVANS C. AGRAPIDIS of HASBROUCK HEIGHTS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 5.4(a) (splitting fee with a non-lawyer), RPC 7.2(c) (giving something of value for recommending the lawyer’s services), RPC 7.3(d) (providing compensation for recommending the lawyer’s services), and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that EVANS C. AGRAPIDIS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-083, concluding that EVANS C. AGRAPIDIS of HASBROUCK HEIGHTS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 5.4(a) (splitting fee with a non-lawyer), RPC 7.2(c) (giving something of value for recommending the lawyer’s services), RPC 7.3(d) (providing compensation for recommending the lawyer’s services), and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that EVANS C. AGRAPIDIS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

905 A.2d 863, 188 N.J. 248, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 1310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-agrapidis-nj-2006.