In re Ago Const. Co.

26 F.2d 257, 1928 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1184
CourtDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina
DecidedMay 4, 1928
DocketNo. 73
StatusPublished

This text of 26 F.2d 257 (In re Ago Const. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Ago Const. Co., 26 F.2d 257, 1928 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1184 (M.D.N.C. 1928).

Opinion

' HAYES, District

Judge. After bearing tbe evidence, tbe court finds as a fact that Judge James L. Webb signed an order in a ease pending in tbe superior court of Montgomery county, North Carolina, entitled E. .J. Ingram v. Ago Construction Company, Inc., appointing W. A. Cochran receiver of tbe company, upon bis giving bond in tbe sum of $10,000; but be declined to give tbe bond and to accept tbe appointment as such receiver, and no receiver has been appointed who has qualified.- Tbe property is in tbe custody and under tbe management of tbe Ago Construction Company, Inc.

■ Tbe court is of tbe opinion, and so bolds, that tbe naming of a receiver by a superior court judge, who requires him to execute a bond in tbe sum of $10,000 before entering upon bis duties as receiver, is not sufficient to constitute tbe appointment of a receiver, within tbe meaning of Bankruptcy Act, § 3 (amendment of 1926. [11 ITSCA § 21]), so as to constitute an act of bankruptcy. Since there is no act of bankruptcy alleged, except tbe appointment of tbe receiver under tbe circumstances above shown, tbe petition must be dismissed.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that tbe petition of Mrs. Bernice S. Ingram et al. against tbe respondent be dismissed, and that tbe petitioners be taxed with tbe costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 F.2d 257, 1928 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ago-const-co-ncmd-1928.