In re Aggrieved Practitioner

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Aggrieved Practitioner

190 So. 3d 1184, 2016 WL 2879946, 2016 La. LEXIS 1123

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 13, 2016

DocketNo. 2016-CC-0379

StatusPublished

This text of 190 So. 3d 1184 (In re Aggrieved Practitioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Aggrieved Practitioner, 190 So. 3d 1184, 2016 WL 2879946, 2016 La. LEXIS 1123 (La. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

| jThe Louisiana State’ Board of Medical Examiners (“LSBME”) seeks review of an order of the district court prohibiting it from publishing notice of the revocation of the license of a physician. Although the district court granted a stay of the LSBME’s decision, it is undisputed that stay has expired, both under its own terms as well as pursuant to the provisions of La. R;S. 49:964. Because the stay has now expired, the district court has no legal authority to prevent the LSBME from publishing notice of its decision.

Accordingly, the writ is granted. The portion of the judgment of the district court providing that the LSBME’s decision “shall not be publicized, published and/or added to the Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiner’s Newsletter” is vacated and set aside.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

| jThe Louisiana State’ Board of Medical Examiners (“LSBME”) seeks review of an order of the district court prohibiting it from publishing notice of the revocation of the license of a physician. Although the district court granted a stay of the LSBME’s decision, it is undisputed that stay has expired, both under its own terms as well as pursuant to the provisions of La. R;S. 49:964. Because the stay has now expired, the district court has no legal authority to prevent the LSBME from publishing notice of its decision.

Accordingly, the writ is granted. The portion of the judgment of the district court providing that the LSBME’s decision “shall not be publicized, published and/or added to the Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiner’s Newsletter” is vacated and set aside.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 So. 3d 1184, 2016 WL 2879946, 2016 La. LEXIS 1123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-aggrieved-practitioner-la-2016.