In re Agard
This text of In re Agard (In re Agard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-XX-XXXXXXX 23-DEC-2019 01:25 PM
SCAD-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
In re: Application for the Reinstatement of
ANDREW A. AGARD
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
(Prior Supreme Court No. SCAD-XX-XXXXXXX; Prior ODC Case No. 13-063-9133)
ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the Report, Findings, and
Recommendation for the Reinstatement of Petitioner Andrew A.
Agard to the practice of law, submitted to this court on
December 11, 2019 by the Disciplinary Board of the Hawai#i
Supreme Court, the record in this matter and in SCAD-XX-XXXXXXX,
and the lack of opposition from the Office of Disciplinary
Counsel,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Andrew A. Agard’s petition
for reinstatement is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 2.17(b) of the
Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i (RSCH), that Andrew A. Agard is reinstated to the practice of law in this
jurisdiction. This order is effective upon filing, subject to
the conditions of RSCH Rule 17(d) concerning proper registration
with the Hawai#i State Bar Association and the payment of
required dues.
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that, pursuant to RSCH Rule
2.17(d), Petitioner Agard shall bear the costs of the
reinstatement proceedings, upon the timely submission of a
verified bill of costs, within 60 days of the date of entry of
this order.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 23, 2019.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re Agard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-agard-haw-2019.