In re Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics

747 A.2d 275, 163 N.J. 62, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 331

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics. Read the opinion of the Court — 162 N.J. 497 →

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 18, 2000·No. DOCKET NO. 1-99·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Court having granted the petition of Charles Z. Schalk, Esquire, for review of the determination in Docket # 1-99 of the Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics,

And counsel having informed the Court that a change in the factual circumstances underlying the inquiry has rendered the application moot,

And good cause appearing;

IT IS ORDERED that the within appeal and the Court’s stay of the Committee’s determination are dismissed as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Court having granted the petition of Charles Z. Schalk, Esquire, for review of the determination in Docket # 1-99 of the Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics,

And counsel having informed the Court that a change in the factual circumstances underlying the inquiry has rendered the application moot,

And good cause appearing;

IT IS ORDERED that the within appeal and the Court’s stay of the Committee’s determination are dismissed as moot.

In re Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics, 747 A.2d 275, 163 N.J. 62, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 331 (N.J. 2000).

Pincite

747 A.2d 275 (In re Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.