In Re Advanced Electronics, Inc.
This text of 99 B.R. 249 (In Re Advanced Electronics, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
At the outset of the hearing by petitioning creditors for appointment of a Trustee and authority to operate the business, counsel moved to incorporate the record developed in the Involuntary Bankruptcy adjudication into this record. Said Motion was granted, therefore, the findings set forth in the earlier adjudication are hereby adopted by this Court.
From the foregoing, it is clear that the Board of Directors in Advanced Electronics, Inc. is in effect deadlocked. This raises serious questions about its ability to operate profitably. According, immediate consideration must be given to the appointment of a Trustee.
We note at the outset that such an appointment would not be grounded on fraud, gross mismanagement or any “cause” mentioned in § 1104(a)(1), rather the following § 1104(a)(2) is relied upon. This permits the Court to order the appointment of a Trustee in the best interests of the estate. As stated in In re Petralex Stainless, Ltd., 78 B.R. 738 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1987) at p. 745:
“Under such chaotic circumstances, a disinterested trustee can impartially assess Petralex’s condition and work with the warring factions, thus facilitating the decision making process.”
*250 In view of the foregoing, we enter the following Order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 B.R. 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-advanced-electronics-inc-pamb-1989.