in Re AdTrak360, LLC, Joseph Natoli and William Higgins
This text of in Re AdTrak360, LLC, Joseph Natoli and William Higgins (in Re AdTrak360, LLC, Joseph Natoli and William Higgins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 25, 2019.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-19-00285-CV
IN RE ADTRAK360, LLC, JOSEPH NATOLI, AND WILLIAM HIGGINS, Relators
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 61st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016-52731
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On April 8, 2019, relators AdTrak360, LLC, Joseph Natoli, and William Higgins filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this court to compel the Honorable Fredericka Phillips, presiding judge of the 61st District Court of Harris County, to grant relators’ motion for leave to file an amended answer.
Relators have not shown that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Bourliot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re AdTrak360, LLC, Joseph Natoli and William Higgins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-adtrak360-llc-joseph-natoli-and-william-higgins-texapp-2019.