in Re: Adrian Castro
This text of in Re: Adrian Castro (in Re: Adrian Castro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-11-00025-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE ADRIAN CASTRO
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Perkes Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion1
Relator, Adrian Castro, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause
on January 18, 2011, seeking to compel the Honorable Federico Hinojosa, who was
assigned to hear the underlying matter in the 94th District Court of Nueces County,
Texas, to withdraw his order of November 12, 2010 compelling arbitration. The Court
requested and received a response to the petition for writ of mandamus from Paula
Wyatt and Wyatt Law Firm Ltd., the real parties in interest herein, and further received a
reply thereto from relator. 1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions). The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of
mandamus, the response thereto, and relator’s reply, is of the opinion that relator has
not shown himself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of
mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 9th day of February, 2011.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Adrian Castro, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-adrian-castro-texapp-2011.