in Re: Adrian Booker
This text of in Re: Adrian Booker (in Re: Adrian Booker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Deny, Strike, Moot and Opinion Filed September 13, 2021
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00735-CV
IN RE ADRIAN BOOKER, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 302nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-15-18807
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Osborne, Pedersen, III, and Goldstein Opinion by Justice Osborne In its August 26, 2021 petition for writ of mandamus, relator challenges
several orders entered by the trial court as void and attaches a few documents.
Based on our review of the petition and attached documents, we conclude that
relator has failed to comply with several requirements set forth in Rule 52 of the
Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, as well as Rule 9.9 requiring redaction of
sensitive information. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus,
strike the petition, and deny the motion to stay as moot.
210735f.p05 /s/ LESLIE OSBORNE LESLIE OSBORNE JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Adrian Booker, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-adrian-booker-texapp-2021.