in Re Adrian Acosta
This text of in Re Adrian Acosta (in Re Adrian Acosta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-22-00055-CV
In re Adrian Acosta
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Adrian Acosta has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to
compel Pfluger Bars, LLC to make certain business records available for examination. However,
we lack jurisdiction to issue such a writ of mandamus unless necessary to enforce our
jurisdiction, which is not implicated here. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221(b); see also In re
Elusive Holdings, Inc., No. 03-21-00563-CV, 2021 WL 6138796, at *2 (Tex. App.—Austin
Dec. 30, 2021, orig. proceeding). The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want
of jurisdiction.
__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Justice
Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana
Filed: February 18, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Adrian Acosta, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-adrian-acosta-texapp-2022.