In Re: Adoption of T.A.M. - Concurring

Court of Appeals of Tennessee·Decided May 12, 2004·No. M2003-02247-COA-R3-PT·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 19, 2004

IN RE: ADOPTION OF T.A.M.

________________________

No. M2003-02247-COA-R3-PT - Filed May 12, 2004

WILLIAM B. CAIN , J., concurring.

I disagree with the standard of review employed by the court in this case for the reasons discussed at more length in In Re Z.J.S., No. M2002-02235-COA-R3-JV, 2003 WL 21266854, at *18-22 (Tenn.Ct.App. June 3, 2003) (No Tenn. R. App. P. 11 application filed); Estate of Acuff v. O’Linger, 56 S.W.3d 527, 533-37 (Tenn.Ct.App. 2001). I agree, however, that a review of the evidence in the case discloses that the truth of the factual conclusions made by the trial are “highly probable” and thus the clear and convincing evidence standard is met. Therefore, I concur with the court’s decision to affirm the order terminating R.G.L.’s parental rights.

_______________________________________ WILLIAM B. CAIN, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re: Adoption of T.A.M. - Concurring, (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).

In Re: Adoption of T.A.M. - Concurring (In Re: Adoption of T.A.M. - Concurring) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Estate of Acuff v. O'Linger
56 S.W.3d 527 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2001)