In Re: Adoption of T.A.M. - Concurring
This text of In Re: Adoption of T.A.M. - Concurring (In Re: Adoption of T.A.M. - Concurring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 19, 2004
IN RE: ADOPTION OF T.A.M.
________________________
No. M2003-02247-COA-R3-PT - Filed May 12, 2004
WILLIAM B. CAIN , J., concurring.
I disagree with the standard of review employed by the court in this case for the reasons discussed at more length in In Re Z.J.S., No. M2002-02235-COA-R3-JV, 2003 WL 21266854, at *18-22 (Tenn.Ct.App. June 3, 2003) (No Tenn. R. App. P. 11 application filed); Estate of Acuff v. O’Linger, 56 S.W.3d 527, 533-37 (Tenn.Ct.App. 2001). I agree, however, that a review of the evidence in the case discloses that the truth of the factual conclusions made by the trial are “highly probable” and thus the clear and convincing evidence standard is met. Therefore, I concur with the court’s decision to affirm the order terminating R.G.L.’s parental rights.
_______________________________________ WILLIAM B. CAIN, JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Adoption of T.A.M. - Concurring, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-adoption-of-tam-concurring-tennctapp-2004.