In re Adoption of Rule 36 of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure

366 Ark. 619
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMay 11, 2006
StatusPublished

This text of 366 Ark. 619 (In re Adoption of Rule 36 of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Adoption of Rule 36 of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure, 366 Ark. 619 (Ark. 2006).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Supreme Court Committee on Criminal Practice proposed the adoption of a new rule to address criminal appeals from district court to circuit court, and the proposal was published for comment. See In Re: Rules of Criminal Procedure, 362 Ark. Appx. 663 (2005). A number of comments were received, and the rule was referred back to the committee for further consideration. The committee has made several changes to the original proposal and has again submitted its work to the court and recommended the rule’s adoption.

Proposed Rule 36 is intended to serve as a comprehensive procedure governing criminal appeals from limited jurisdiction courts to circuit courts. Such appeals are currently governed by District Court Rule 9, which generally is a rule for civil actions. The rule attempts to codify existing practice as reflected in District Court Rule 9 and statutes. Highlights of the changes in the rule from the proposal published in 2005 include the following:

&emdash; 36(c). Clarification that request for the record is filed with the district court clerk and service is made on the prosecuting attorney.
&emdash; 36(d). Addition of 10 days to file affidavit when district court clerk fails to prepare and certify the record and clarification that circuit court acquires jurisdiction upon filing of the affidavit. Velek v. State (City of Little Rock), 364 Ark. 531, 222 S.W.3d 182 (2006).
&emdash; 36(e). Term “supersedeas” is deleted and clarification that appearance bond stays the imposition of the judgment imposed by the district court.

These changes and the rule itself are further explained in the accompanying Reporter’s Notes.

We have reviewed the committee’s revisions and the rule as a whole. We thank the committee for its work, and the judges and lawyers who reviewed the proposal and submitted comments. We are in agreement with the committee’s recommendation and adopt Rule 36 as published below to be effective June 1, 2006.

Rule 36. Appeals from District Court to Circuit Court.

(a) Right to Appeal. A person convicted of a criminal offense in a district court, including a person convicted upon a plea of guilty, may appeal the judgment of conviction to the circuit court for the judicial district in which the conviction occurred. The state shall have no right of appeal from a judgment of a district court.

(b) Time for Taking Appeal. An appeal from a district court to the circuit court shall be filed in the office of the clerk of the circuit court having jurisdiction of the appeal within thirty (30) days from the date of the entry of the judgment in the district court. The 30-day period is not extended by the filing of a post-trial motion under Rule 33.3.

(c) How Taken. An appeal from a district court to circuit court shall be taken by filing with the clerk of the circuit court a record of the proceedings in the district court. Neither a notice of appeal nor an order granting an appeal shall be required. It shall be the duty of the clerk of the district court to prepare and certify such record when the defendant files a written request to that effect with the clerk of the district court and pays any fees of the district court authorized by law therefor. The defendant shall serve a copy of the written request on the prosecuting attorney for the judicial district and shall file a certificate of such service with the district court. The defendant shall have the responsibility of filing the certified record in the office of the circuit clerk. The record shall include any bond or other security filed by the defendant to guarantee the defendant’s appearance before the circuit court. Except as otherwise provided in subsection (d) of this rule, the circuit court shall acquire jurisdiction of the appeal upon the filing of the certified record in the office of the circuit clerk.

(d) Failure of clerk to file record. If the clerk of the district court does not prepare and certify a record for filing in the circuit court in a timely manner, the defendant may take an appeal by filing an affidavit in the office of the circuit clerk, within forty (40) days from the date of the entry of the judgment in the district court, showing (i) that the defendant has requested the clerk of the district court to prepare and certify the record for purposes of appeal and (ii) that the clerk has not done so within thirty (30) days from the date of the entry of the judgment in the district court. The defendant shall promptly serve a copy of such affidavit upon the clerk of the district court and upon the prosecuting attorney. The circuit court shall acquire jurisdiction of the appeal upon the filing of the affidavit. On motion of the defendant or the prosecuting attorney, the circuit court may order the clerk of the district court to prepare, certify, and file a record in the circuit court.

(e) Bond. When an appeal is taken from a district court to circuit court, the district court may require the defendant to post a bond or other security to guarantee the appearance of the defendant before the circuit court, provided that an appearance bond originally posted with the district court to guarantee the appearance of the defendant before that court shall serve to guarantee the appearance of the defendant before the circuit court on appeal. The approval of the bond or other security to guarantee the appearance of the defendant before the circuit court shall stay the imposition of the judgment imposed by the district court. The clerk of the district court shall transmit any bond or other security to the circuit court. The failure of the defendant to post a bond or other security with the district court shall not prevent the circuit court from acquiring jurisdiction of the appeal. After acquiring jurisdiction of the appeal, the circuit court may modify the bond or other security.

(f) Notice. When the record of the proceeding in the district court is filed in the office of the circuit clerk, the circuit clerk shall promptly give written notice thereof to the prosecuting attorney and to the circuit judge to whom the appeal is assigned.

(g) Trial De Novo. An appeal from a judgment of conviction in a district court shall be tried de novo in the circuit court as if no judgment had been rendered in the district court.

(h) Default Judgment. The circuit court may affirm the judgment of the district court if (i) the defendant fails to appear in circuit court when the case is set for trial; or (ii) the clerk of the district court fails to prepare and certify a record for filing in the circuit court as provided in subsection (c) of this rule and the defendant fails to move the circuit court for an order to compel the filing of the record within thirty (30) days after fifing the affidavit provided in subsection (d) of this rule.

(i) District court without clerk. If a district court has no clerk, any reference in this rule to the clerk of a district court shall be deemed to refer to the judge of the district court.

Reporter’s Notes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Velek v. State (City of Little Rock)
222 S.W.3d 182 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2006)
Bocksnick v. City of London
825 S.W.2d 267 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
366 Ark. 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-adoption-of-rule-36-of-the-arkansas-rules-of-criminal-procedure-ark-2006.