In re Adoption of Cassada

171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 368
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 21, 1960·No. No. 36492·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of reversal by the Court of Appeals for failure of proof by the greater weight of the evi[369]*369deuce is in effect an expression of its conclusion that the judgment of the Probate Court is against the weight of the evidence (State v. Geghan, 166 Ohio St., 188). In such a case it is the sole function of the Court of Appeals to set aside the judgment and remand the cause for a new trial. The C.ourt of Appeals was in error in rendering final judgment. State v. Geghan, supra; Bown & Sons v. Honabarger, 171 Ohio St., 247. Therefore, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the Probate Court for further proceedings.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Adoption of Cassada, 171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 368 (Ohio 1960).

171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 368 (In re Adoption of Cassada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.